Nnormal kjreg 1

Learn more about the Nnormal kjreg 1 male running shoes, including key features, performance, reviews, model updates, and more.

Nnormal kjreg 1

Price

400

Rating

High

Popularity

Less Popular

The Nnormal kjreg 1 is a mid-range, versatile running shoe positioned between the entry-level Kjerg Basic and the high-performance Kjerg Pro models in the Nnormal lineup.

5 colorways

Colorway: Black

Widths available: normal

Got a question about the Nnormal kjreg 1?
AI-powered

We've got access to 1000s of long-form youtube, google and other Fittir user reviews which means we can answer any question about this shoe. Ask anything, and me and my AI assistant will do our best to answer your question.

Summary

The Nnormal kjreg 1 is a versatile and comfortable running shoe designed for the everyday runner looking for a balance between performance and comfort. It features a well-cushioned sole that provides excellent shock absorption, making it suitable for both long-distance runs and daily training sessions. In the Nnormal lineup, the kjreg 1 is positioned as a versatile option, fitting between more specialized performance models and the entry-level options. It offers a blend of durability, support, and comfort, catering to runners who need a reliable shoe for mixed terrains and varying intensities.

Surface

trail

Cushioning

MinLowMediumHighMax(20.5mm)

Breathability

LowMediumHigh(Bio-based Matryx upper)

Weight

200g

Heel-to-Toe Drop

6mm0mm14mm

Support

NeutralLightHigh

Width options

normal

Grip

LowMediumHighMax(medium density, 3.5mm lugs) - Vibram Megagrip Litebase rubber

Suitability

___% Match

Based on your running profile and intended use, this shoe is a ___% match. Click the dropdowns in each section to learn more.

Based on your running style and needs

▼

Want to know if the Nnormal kjreg 1 is right for you?

Our shoe finder is personalised to your needs, and has been used by thousands of runners across the globe.

Get a personalised recommendation

Pros & Cons

AI-powered

Fittir conducts a detailed analysis of the Nnormal kjreg 1 to provide you with a comprehensive overview of the shoes features, pros, and cons based on 11 wear-tester reviews.

Summary: The Nnormal Kjerag trail running shoe, designed by Kilian Jornet, is highly regarded for its lightweight construction, exceptional grip, and versatility across various terrains, making it ideal for racing and technical trails. However, while it offers impressive performance and comfort, some reviewers noted concerns about its cushioning for long distances and its higher price point, suggesting it may be best suited for experienced runners rather than beginners or those seeking ultra-distance comfort..

Most Mentioned Pros

Most Mentioned Cons

cushion
Cushion feeling: Firm

The main points to note are that many users appreciate the soft and responsive cushioning for comfort and energy return, while a significant number express concerns about the shoe having less cushioning than expected, particularly for longer runs.

stack height (2)

bounce (2)

firmness (2)

comfort (1)

energy (1)

forgiveness (1)

technical (1)

midsole (1)

Pros

"The cushioning is soft and responsive, providing comfort during runs."

responsive

cushioning

"The shoe offers excellent energy return and cushioning despite its low weight."

energy return

cushioning

"The midsole provides a lively and forgiving feel while running."

lively

forgiving

"The technical cushioning allows for a combination of comfort and performance."

cushioning

comfort

dense midsole

"The shoe's midsole delivers an energetic and reactive ride while maintaining protection."

cushioned feel

stability

protection

"The EExpure foam midsole offers stability, responsiveness, and comfort, enhancing the overall running experience."

responsive

energy return

stability

"The midsole gives a surprising amount of cushioning and protection with a lower stack height."

cushioning

protection

"The cushioning offers impressive bounce and comfort, which is commendable for a minimalist shoe."

comfort

minimalist

cushioning

"The cushioning offers a good level of comfort and bounce."

cushioning

energy return

comfortable

"The Kjerag shoes offer impressive shock absorbance and stability."

midsole

stability

shock absorbance

"The EEXPURE midsole foam offers excellent durability and stability during runs."

durability

stability

reactivity

Cons

"The shoe has a lower level of cushioning than expected."

cushioning

minimal

"The shoe has less cushion than some of its competitors, which may not be suitable for all runners."

cushioning

stack height

competitors

"The shoe may not provide enough stack height for longer distances."

distance

cushioning

"The firmness of the midsole foam may lead to discomfort for runners looking for more plush cushioning."

firmness

cushioning

long-distance

"The cushioning is firmer compared to other brands, which may not suit everyone."

cushioning

firmness

comfort

"The Kjerag may not be ideal for ultra-distance runs due to its reduced foam cushioning."

skeptical

ultra-distance

training

"The shoe lacks adequate cushioning for longer runs."

lack cushioning

long runs

"The drop of 6mm and stack height of 23.5mm may not provide enough cushioning for long distances."

drop

stack height

long distance

"The shoe's cushioning and responsiveness details were not elaborated on, leaving uncertainty about comfort on long runs."

cushioning

responsiveness

long runs

"The firm midsole increases impact forces, particularly on descents, leading to discomfort."

impact

descents

firmness

"The shoe may not have enough cushion for those who prefer maximalism."

cushioning

maximalism

"The shoes may not provide enough cushioning for very long distances."

cushioning

long distances

performance

comfort
Breathability: Average

The main points to note are that the shoe's comfort is often praised for its midsole foam and generous front volume, but many users also report issues with stiffness, lack of an insole, and discomfort during long runs.

materials (2)

midsole (1)

protection (1)

volume (1)

space (1)

lack (1)

upper (1)

insole (1)

Pros

"The midsole foam conforms well to the foot over time, improving comfort."

foam

adaptability

personalization

"The shoe offers excellent ground feel, flexibility, and stability with appropriate protection."

ground feel

flexibility

stability

"The shoe offers a generous front volume, accommodating the natural movement of the foot."

generous

comfort

natural movement

"The Kjerag features a very comfortable upper that is pleasant to wear."

comfortable

upper

wearability

"The upper of the Kjerag is more comfortable than the Pulsar, making it easier to wear."

comfortable

durability

upper

"The shoes have a generous front volume, providing comfort over long distances."

front volume

long distance

heat

Cons

"There is no sock liner in the shoe, which may affect comfort for some runners."

sock liner

insole

comfort

"The upper material is described as feeling a little stiff and bunches around the forefoot area."

stiffness

toe box

upper

"Some runners might find the lack of an insole uncomfortable, especially on technical terrain."

insole

comfort

sustainability

"There is a longer break-in time required for comfort."

longer break-in

"Initial comfort is poor due to upper stiffness and hard midsole."

stiff upper

hard midsole

"The lack of an insole can lead to discomfort during prolonged runs, especially on longer distances."

insole

blisters

fatigue

"The comfort level is limited for prolonged use in ultras."

comfort

ultra

endurance

"The shoe feels stiff and lacks flexibility."

stiff

rigid

midsole

"The shoe can cause soreness in feet after use, particularly on technical trails."

soreness

technical trails

discomfort

"There is potential for blisters due to the shoe's design features."

comfort

blisters

design

durability

The main points to note are that durability is frequently highlighted as a strong feature of the shoe, while concerns about its durability due to its lightweight design and untested materials are also mentioned.

upper (2)

materials (1)

protection (1)

upper materials (1)

design (1)

long-lasting (1)

longevity (1)

material (1)

Pros

"The shoe is constructed with durable materials, ensuring longevity."

Kevlar

long-lasting

"The deep rubber toe bumper adds to the durability and protects the foot."

toe bumper

durable

"The shoe's upper is made of durable and breathable materials that enhance comfort."

breathable

durable

"The Kjerag shoe features a simple and quality-driven design."

quality

simplicity

materials

"The upper is made from durable materials that hold up well in tough conditions."

durable

resistant

protection

"The Matryx jacquard upper provides a lightweight yet durable design that requires no excessive supports."

upper material

lightweight

durable

"The Kjerag offers impressive durability, enhancing its long-term usability."

durability

high quality

value

"Durability appears to be a strong point for the Kjerag, expected to withstand significant mileage."

durability

long-lasting

"The Kevlar yarn used in the upper contributes significantly to its durability and protection."

kevlar

protection

"The upper is breathable and made from durable materials, enhancing overall comfort during runs."

breathable

durable

trail running

"The Kjerag has a durable design with robust materials that are built to last."

durability

Vibram

material

"Kjerag features an exceptionally breathable and durable MATRYX® upper."

breathable

resistant

lightweight

"The shoe demonstrates impressive durability and can withstand tough wear and tear."

durable materials

cost effective

Cons

"Durability claims may be undermined by the shoe's lightweight design."

durability

lightweight

"The durability of the materials used in the shoe has not been tested over time yet."

durability

materials

long-distance

"While the shoe is breathable, it may not be durable enough under certain conditions."

breathability

material

durability

performance
Distance suited: Long (>20km)
Rocker: Less rocker

The most common pros highlight that the shoe is lightweight, which enhances performance and versatility, while the main cons point out issues with responsiveness and comfort during relaxed runs.

weight (1)

versatile (1)

ground feel (1)

lightweight (1)

technology (1)

versatility (1)

responsiveness (1)

snap (1)

Pros

"The shoe is lightweight, enhancing performance."

lightweight

performance

"The shoe is lightweight, enhancing overall performance."

lightweight

agility

performance

"The shoe is notably lightweight, which enhances the overall running experience."

lightweight

minimalist

trail running

"The Nnormal Kjerag is lightweight, enhancing overall running speed."

lightweight

trail

speed

"The performance of the Kjerag is noted as versatile for various terrains."

versatile performance

fast running

variety of terrains

"The lack of an insole allows for superior ground feel and nimbleness during runs."

nimble

responsive

"The NNormal Kjerag features a lightweight design, making it suitable for long-distance runs."

lightweight

long-distance

trail

"Features advanced materials and technologies aiming to enhance overall performance."

high-quality

innovation

materials

"Designed to handle a range of terrain from steep traverses to lengthy distances, showing versatility."

versatile

different terrains

multi-use

"The Kjerag is lightweight and provides excellent responsiveness."

lightweight

energetic

responsive

Cons

"The Kjerag lacks a plate which could improve responsiveness and snap."

plate

responsiveness

competitors

"It can feel harsh during relaxed running or when heel striking."

not for relaxed runs

heel strikes

"The midsole feels flat with no propelling shape, reducing performance."

flat

performance

midsole

"The weight is above some modern competitors."

weight

comparison

"The responsiveness of the shoe can be excessive on sharp rocky terrain."

sharp terrain

responsiveness

comfort

"The thin rock plate may provide too much ground feel for some users."

rock plate

ground feel

protection

fit
True to size: Runs large
Toebox width: Wider
Heel width: Narrower
Orthotic friendly: No

The main concerns with the shoe are that it may not fit all foot shapes well and that it runs long, which could lead to sizing issues for many users.

length (2)

midfoot (1)

accommodation (1)

tongue design (1)

secured (1)

security (1)

lockdown (1)

toe box (1)

Pros

"The shoe fits snugly around the midfoot, ensuring a secure feel."

secure fit

comfortable

"The Kjerag can accommodate a variety of foot shapes due to its forgiving upper."

forgiving

wide foot

"The fully-gusseted tongue helps to secure the midfoot and prevent slippage."

slippage

midfoot security

"The shoe fits well, providing a locked-down feel without too much snugness."

locked down

roomy

comfortable fit

"The fit of the Kjerag is secure and snug, providing excellent comfort without pressure points."

snug fit

comfort

"The excellent lockdown design helps accommodate runners who may need to size down without compromising fit."

secure fit

size adaptability

"The shoe provides very good foot lockdown, reducing slippage."

foot lockdown

blister prevention

"The shoe allows for good toe movement due to its spacious toe box."

spacious

movement

comfort

"The simple lacing system is effective and functional, making it easy to use."

simple

effective

user-friendly

"Kjerag shoes allow for natural foot movement, helping to prevent muscle fatigue and blisters."

muscle fatigue

blister prevention

natural fit

Cons

"The fit may leave some space under the arch and around the edges of the foot, potentially leading to issues."

fit

blisters

excess room

"The heel collar is shallow and minimally padded, which may lead to stability issues."

heel

collar

stability

"The shoe runs long, making sizing important."

sizing

length

"The Kjerag runs long in the forefoot and toebox, which may require runners to size down."

sizing

forefoot

toebox

"The midfoot upper is tight, which may be uncomfortable for some runners."

tight

midfoot

"The shoe's fit may not accommodate all foot shapes adequately."

fit

foot shape

accommodation

"The heel is narrow, which could bottom out under heavier runners, causing discomfort."

narrow

discomfort

heel

"The lockdown of the Kjerag is decent but inferior to the Pulsar, affecting fit."

lockdown

lacing system

fit

"Some users may find the sizing issue requires trying on multiple sizes for the correct fit."

sizing

fit

shopping

stability
Stability level: Average

The main points to note are that the shoe is praised for its good ground feel and stable platform, but it also faces criticism for potentially lacking stability due to its minimal structure and aggressive design.

ground feel (1)

motion (1)

nimble (1)

platform (1)

structure (1)

perception (1)

overall (1)

heel support (1)

Pros

"The shoe provides good ground feel, aiding in stability on uneven terrains."

ground response

stability

"The shoe maintains a stable feel throughout the running motion."

stable

performance

foams

"The Nnormal Kjerag provides excellent stability for a fast runner."

stability

fast running

technical terrain

"The Kjerag offers a stable platform, reducing the impact from jabs of rocks while running on rugged terrain."

stability

wide

protection

Cons

"The Kjerag potentially lacks stability due to its minimal structure."

stability

minimalism

"Some users may find the shoe less stable due to its aggressive design."

less stable

"Stability is not great and requires careful foot placement."

stability

performance

trail

"The heel lacks rigidity, affecting support."

heel

support

stability

"The low upper construction may not offer enough ankle stability."

ankle

upper

freedom

"There's no information on whether the shoe provides adequate stability on uneven terrain."

stability

uneven terrain

natural movement

"The 6mm drop may not be suitable for all runners."

drop

stability

grip

The pros of the shoe's grip, such as excellent traction on various terrains and effective performance in dry conditions, are highlighted frequently, while the cons mainly focus on reduced traction in wet conditions and limitations on soft ground.

traction (2)

performance (1)

outsole (1)

lugs (1)

wet (1)

protection (1)

wet performance (1)

forefoot pressure (1)

Pros

"The shoe offers excellent grip for trail conditions."

trail

grip

"The outsole features Vibram MegaGrip rubber offering excellent traction."

Vibram

grip

traction

"The grip provided by the lugs and outsole is highly effective on various terrains."

Vibram

lugs

wet surfaces

"The traction excels on dry terrains due to the Vibram Litebase material."

Vibram Litebase

dry terrains

hardpack

"The Kjerag's outsole provides excellent grip and versatility across multiple terrains."

grippy

versatile

"The Vibram Litebase and Megagrip soles provide excellent traction for various trail conditions."

traction

grip

outsole

"The VIBRAM® LITEBASE and MEGAGRIP outsole provide excellent grip on various terrains."

sticky

durable

versatile

"The grip provided by the Vibram MegaGrip rubber is highly praised."

high performance

stability on terrain

"The Kjerag offers excellent traction on challenging trails."

traction

testing

performance

"The Vibram Litebase Megagrip outsole provides exceptional traction across various terrains."

traction

versatile

multi-terrain

"The lug pattern on the outsole is optimized for a variety of trail conditions, providing confidence in grip."

all-terrain

traction

"The grip and adherence on wet or soaked ground is quite good, which is essential for trail running."

grip

adherence

trail running

Cons

"The outsole’s small rock plate leaves feet vulnerable to rocks and debris."

outsole

rock plate

technical terrain

"Traction is significantly reduced in wet conditions."

poor traction

wet conditions

"The need for constant forefoot pressure affects traction for tired runners."

forefoot pressure

traction issues

"Traction on loose terrain is insufficient due to shallow lugs."

traction

loose terrain

"There is no mention of the shoe’s grip performance on varied terrain."

grip

terrain

performance

"The broad lugs on the outsole make the shoe biased for firm terrain, which limits versatility."

lugs

firm terrain

traction

"The shoe lacks effective grip on soft ground and mud, limiting terrain adaptability."

soft ground

mud

ineffective

other

The main points to note are that the shoe is frequently mentioned as being lightweight and eco-friendly, while it is also commonly criticized for being relatively expensive.

sustainability (3)

price (3)

weight (2)

lightness (1)

ground feel (1)

aesthetics (1)

experience (1)

insulation (1)

Pros

"The Nnormal Kjerag is impressively lightweight for a performance shoe."

lightweight

performance

"The Kjerag is an exceptionally lightweight shoe, making it ideal for various activities."

lightweight

versatility

"The shoe is extremely lightweight, making it ideal for technical terrain."

ultralight

technical terrain

performance

"The shoe maintains a good blend of sensitivity and ground feel for accurate foot placement."

sensitivity

confident foot placement

technical running

"The Kjerag features an impressive and visually appealing colorway that stands out."

colorway

design

"Overall, the Kjerag encourages a fun running experience, making you forget about the shoe itself."

fun

exciting

"The shoe is designed using planet-friendly production processes, appealing to eco-conscious runners."

eco-friendly

sustainability

materials

"The Kjerag is eco-responsible, which is a positive feature for environmentally conscious runners."

eco-friendly

sustainability

"The Kjerag is made using ethically sourced and environmentally friendly materials."

eco-friendly

ethical manufacturing

Cons

"The shoe is considered relatively expensive compared to others in the market."

expensive

value

"The shoe is expensive."

expensive

"The shoe is more expensive compared to similar models."

cost

value

"The upper's lack of structure may not insulate well against cold conditions."

cold

insulation

"Sensitivity is reduced due to the dense Vibram Litebase."

reduced sensitivity

Need help picking the right size?

Take a short quiz to help us find the right size for you compared to your current shoe. It takes 2 minutes.

Get started

Model Updates

Older Models

Newer Models

Reviews

Read reviews about the Nnormal kjreg 1 from across the internet, including reviews from other runners on Fittir, wear testers from google & youtube, and more.

Reviews on Fittir (-)

...

Wear-tester reviews (11)

4.3/5

Prices

Find the best price for the Nnormal kjreg 1 from across the internet with our partnered shoe retailers*.

Only null

We couldn't find any stock with our partners. Try searching google instead.

*When you click through to the retailer, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Its a great way to support us and keep this site free.

Similar Shoes

Most similar

Cheaper

More cushioned

More grip

Lighter

More responsive

Softer Cushion

Same brand

Different brand

Less cushioned

More expensive

New

Find out if the Nnormal kjreg 1 is right for you.

Get a personalised running shoe recommendation based on your preferences and needs (free).

Get a recommendation

Nnormal kjreg 1

Nnormal kjreg 1

Surface

Cushioning

Category

Breathability

Weight

Heel-to-Toe Drop

Support

Width options

Grip

Suitability

Based on your running style and needs

Want to know if the Nnormal kjreg 1 is right for you?

Pros & Cons

Most Mentioned Pros

Most Mentioned Cons

cushion

Pros

Cons

comfort

Pros

Cons

durability

Pros

Cons

performance

Pros

Cons

fit

Pros

Cons

stability

Pros

Cons

grip

Pros

Cons

other

Pros

Cons

Need help picking the right size?

Older Models

Newer Models

...

4.3/5

Similar Shoes

Find out if the Nnormal kjreg 1 is right for you.