Asics gt-1000 13

Learn more about the Asics gt-1000 13 male running shoes, including key features, performance, reviews, model updates, and more.

Asics gt-1000 13

Price

$140

Rating

Average

Popularity

Low

The Asics GT-1000 13 is a versatile, mid-range stability running shoe designed for everyday use, positioned between the entry-level GT-2000 series and the premium Kayano series in the Asics lineup.

5 colorways

Colorway: Indigo Blue/White

Widths available: normal, wide, extra-wide

Got a question about the Asics gt-1000 13?
AI-powered

We've got access to 1000s of long-form youtube, google and other Fittir user reviews which means we can answer any question about this shoe. Ask anything, and me and my AI assistant will do our best to answer your question.

Summary

The Asics GT-1000 13 is a versatile and reliable running shoe within Asics's lineup, designed to offer a balance between cushioning and stability. It is ideal for runners seeking a supportive shoe for daily training, catering especially to overpronators who require additional support. Falling in the mid-range of Asics's offerings, it is positioned between the more premium GT-2000 and the entry-level Gel-Contend. The GT-1000 13 combines lightweight construction with responsive cushioning, making it a popular choice for those who want a stable yet agile shoe for medium distances.

Surface

road

Cushioning

MinLowMediumHighMax(32mm)

Breathability

LowMediumHigh(engineered mesh upper)

Weight

275g

Heel-to-Toe Drop

8mm0mm14mm

Support

NeutralLightHigh

Width options

normal, wide, extra-wide

Grip

LowMediumHighMax

Suitability

___% Match

Based on your running profile and intended use, this shoe is a ___% match. Click the dropdowns in each section to learn more.

Based on your running style and needs

▼

Want to know if the Asics gt-1000 13 is right for you?

Our shoe finder is personalised to your needs, and has been used by thousands of runners across the globe.

Get a personalised recommendation

Pros & Cons

AI-powered

Fittir conducts a detailed analysis of the Asics gt-1000 13 to provide you with a comprehensive overview of the shoes features, pros, and cons based on 9 wear-tester reviews.

Summary: The ASICS GT-1000 13 is generally well-received for its comfort, improved cushioning, and stability, making it a solid choice for budget-conscious runners, particularly those with overpronation. However, some reviewers note that it does not significantly improve upon its predecessor and may lack the support and energy return found in higher-end models like the GT-2000..

Most Mentioned Pros

Most Mentioned Cons

cushion
Cushion feeling: Normal

The pros highlight the cushioning's softness and responsiveness, while the cons emphasize that it may not be soft enough for everyone and lacks adequate support for long-distance runs.

softness (2)

cushioning (1)

balance (1)

responsiveness (1)

support (1)

quality (1)

foam firmness (1)

firmness (1)

Pros

"The updated cushioning uses pure gel, providing a softer feel."

gel cushioning

soft feel

comfort

"The introduction of PureGEL technology provides softer landings for heel strikers."

PureGEL

cushioning

heel strikers

"The ASICS GT 1000 13 has increased cushioning, which improves the running experience."

cushioning

comfort

support

"The overall cushioning is responsive and balanced, promoting a comfortable ride."

GEL technology

responsive

comfortable

"The GT-2000 v13 features superior cushioning with FF Blast Plus, offering a responsive and plush ride for longer runs."

cushioning

energy return

plush

"The cushioning in the GT 2000 is noticeably better compared to the GT 1000."

cushioning

comfort

comparison

Cons

"The cushioning is softer than previous versions but not as soft as desired."

cushioning

softness

comparison

"The shoe lacks adequate cushioning for long-distance runs."

cushioning

long-distance

"The shoe is described as fairly cushioned but not overly so, which might not fit all preferences."

lightweight

cushioning

moderate

"Although the cushioning is good, it doesn’t provide a noticeably better experience than previous models."

cushioning

comfort

"The midsole foam remains relatively firm, which may not appeal to those used to softer shoes."

midsole

foam

firmness

"The GT-1000 offers a firmer ride due to its cushioning."

FlyteFoam

connected feel

EVA foam

"The GT-1000 lacks bounciness compared to the GT-2000."

less bouncy

cushioning

GT-2000

"While the GT 2000 is praised for comfort, the difference in cushioning between the two shoes is minimal and may not justify the cost for all users."

cushioning

difference

value

comfort
Breathability: More breathable

The main points to note are that breathability is frequently mentioned as a pro, while support and fit issues are common cons.

overall (2)

cushioning (2)

breathability (1)

smoothness (1)

amortecimento (1)

fit (1)

injury recovery (1)

support (1)

Pros

"The upper material is now seamless, enhancing breathability."

seamless

breathable

upper material

"The engineered mesh upper provides good breathability, keeping feet cool during runs."

engineered mesh

breathable

ventilation

"The engineered mesh upper in the GT-1000 v13 enhances breathability and comfort during runs."

mesh

breathability

comfort

"The breathable mesh upper enhances overall comfort and fit."

breathable

mesh

comfort

"The shoe offers a smoother feel compared to previous versions."

smoother feel

upgraded experience

"The comfort provided by the Flight Foam is satisfactory for running."

comfort

amortecimento

Flight Foam

"The shoe offers enhanced overall comfort, making it suitable for long runs."

comfort

long runs

daily training

"The ASICS GT 2000 is extremely comfortable for flatfoot runners."

comfort

flatfoot

recommendation

"The shoe's construction allows for a comfortable fit without feeling constricted."

fit

comfort

freedom

"The shoes helped alleviate pain from a previous knee injury, allowing for a better running experience."

pain relief

injury

running

Cons

"The shoe lacks the level of support found in the higher model GT2000."

support

cushioning

comparison

"This shoe is not ideal for runners who require maximum cushioning."

cushioning

max cushion

recommendation

"The heel portion of the shoe has excessive cushioning which leads to discomfort during runs."

excessive cushioning

heel discomfort

"The upper design has slightly reduced breathability compared to previous versions."

breathability

upper design

"The tongue lacks a gusset type, making it shift around during use."

gusset

tongue

comfort

"The overall fit of the upper is disappointing due to issues created by the lacing and heel cushioning."

upper fit

cushioning issues

durability

outsole (1)

material (1)

toebox (1)

Pros

"The shoe has a durable outsole, suitable for various running conditions and longevity."

durability

outsole

longevity

"The shoes are highly durable, handling regular wear and different conditions well."

AHAR

durability

wear-resistance

Cons

"Durability tests still show some weakness, particularly with the toebox."

toebox

durability

low score

"Durability may be a concern for high-mileage runners."

sustainability

high-mileage

performance
Distance suited: Long (>20km)
Rocker: Average

The main points to note are that the shoe is lighter and stable, making it good for daily training, but many users feel its overall performance is just average and lacks energy return.

weight (1)

stability (1)

endurance (1)

responsiveness (1)

overall (1)

energy return (1)

Pros

"The shoe has become lighter, improving usability."

lightweight

performance

"The GT 13 maintains a stable performance similar to its predecessors."

stability

performance

comparative

"It is ready for long runs, making it a good choice for daily training."

long runs

daily training

performance

"A noticeable improvement in the shoe's responsiveness enhances the running experience."

performance

responsiveness

cushioning

Cons

"The overall running experience with the shoe is described as average and lacks exceptional performance."

performance

middling

"Energy return of the shoe is lacking, which may disappoint runners looking for responsiveness."

energy return

responsiveness

"The shoe's midsole lacks adequate energy return on toe-offs, affecting performance during runs."

energy return

performance issue

fit
True to size: True to size
Toebox width: Narrower
Heel width: Narrower
Orthotic friendly: No

The pros highlight that the shoe fits accurately and securely, while the cons indicate that it may not be suitable for wide feet and can feel inconsistent for different foot shapes.

size (1)

tapered_fit (1)

secure_fit (1)

perfect fit (1)

lacing (1)

tapered (1)

security (1)

inconsistency (1)

Pros

"The fit of the GT 13 is accurate and true to size."

fit

true to size

"The GT-2000 v13 has a tapered fit that gives it a racing shoe feel, appealing to those who prefer a snugger fit."

fit

snug

racing

"The GT-2000 v13's gusseted tongue offers a more secure fit compared to the non-gusseted version in the GT-1000 v13."

gusseted

tongue

fit

"The shoe offers a perfect fit, being neither too tight nor too loose."

fit

comfort

Cons

"The lacing system is insufficiently designed due to the short length of the laces, making it difficult to secure a proper fit."

short laces

secure fit

discomfort

"The GT-2000's fit may not accommodate wide feet well due to its tapered design."

tapered fit

wide feet

toe conditions

"The non-gusseted tongue on the GT-1000 lacks the extra security found in the GT-2000's design."

tongue design

lockdown

non-gusseted

"The fit can feel inconsistent for different foot shapes."

fit issues

foot shape

"The GT 1000 feels less supportive and more suited for neutral runners."

arch support

neutral

over pronation

stability
Stability level: More stable

The most common points are that the shoe has a new 3D Guidance System for improved stability, which is mentioned frequently, while a notable con is that the shoe may lack firmness, which could be important for some runners.

guidance (3)

support (3)

affordability (1)

heel_support (1)

base_width (1)

balance (1)

heel support (1)

firmness (1)

Pros

"The shoe features a new 3D guidance system for improved foot support."

3D guidance

foot support

neutral position

"The ASICS GT 1000 13 features a new 3D Guidance System that enhances stability effectively."

3D Guidance System

stability

natural

"The 3D Guidance System in both models helps manage overpronation and enhances stability during runs."

3D Guidance System

overpronation

control

"The shoe is enhanced for heel strikers, providing necessary support for this running style."

heel strikers

support

stability

"The GT-1003 is specifically designed for over pronators, offering necessary support."

over pronation

support system

"The shoes provide excellent stability, especially for flatfoot runners."

stability

flatfoot

over pronation

"The GT-1000 v13 offers a good balance of affordability and performance, making it a great choice for everyday use."

affordability

reliability

stability

"The GT-1000 v13 provides a more stable heel counter, beneficial for runners needing extra heel support."

heel counter

support

stability

"Both models provide a wide base for stability, helping to create a stable platform during runs."

wide base

stability

platform

"It has a structured support system that helps maintain balance while running."

balance

guidance

"The reinforced heel contributes positively to posture and gait."

reinforced heel

posture

gait

Cons

"There may be a lack of firmness that could be crucial for some runners."

guidance

firmness

support

"The shoe might not suit runners with an extreme heel-striking technique due to its medium drop."

medium drop

heel strike

"The new 3D Guidance System makes the shoe noticeably wider."

3D Guidance System

wide fit

"The GT-2000's heel counter offers less stability than the GT-1000."

heel counter

stability

GT-1000

"The thinner heel design of the GT-2000 may not provide enough support for some users."

thin heel

flexibility

heel support

"Performance may be hindered on uneven terrains due to stability issues."

performance

stability

grip

traction (1)

Pros

Cons

"There may be issues with grip on wet surfaces."

wet surfaces

traction issues

other

The main points to note are that the shoe is versatile and budget-friendly, but it lacks significant innovation and has received criticism for its price and design.

versatility (2)

aesthetics (2)

weight (1)

price (1)

design (1)

value (1)

innovation (1)

pricing (1)

Pros

"The shoe maintains versatility for gym use."

gym use

versatile

"The shoe functions well for walking or gym sessions, adding to its versatility."

multipurpose

walking

gym

"Despite its features, the shoe maintains a reasonable weight, making it manageable for various activities."

lightweight

comfort

performance

"This model is budget-friendly, making it accessible for many runners."

budget-friendly

affordable

"These shoes have a durable shoelace design that stays tied during runs."

shoelace

durability

design

"Both models are suitable for budget-conscious runners without compromising quality."

affordability

budget

entry-level

Cons

"The shoe does not significantly differ from its predecessor, which may disappoint fans looking for innovation."

comparison

predecessor

innovation

design

"The price of the shoe is considered excessive given its features."

pricing

value

"There was no significant visual redesign, leading to a perception of a lack of creativity from the brand."

design

creativity

"The shoes have an unattractive color option that was initially disappointing."

color

design

appearance

"There has been a price increase for the shoe."

price

increase

"There are no reflective elements on the shoe, which is a missed opportunity for added visibility."

reflective elements

visibility

"The heel tab is missing, which could help in ease of wear."

heel tab

ease of wear

"The review mentions a lack of variation in shoelace quality between the models."

shoelaces

quality

perception

Need help picking the right size?

Take a short quiz to help us find the right size for you compared to your current shoe. It takes 2 minutes.

Get started

Model Updates

The Asics GT-1000 13 features an updated engineered mesh upper that improves breathability and provides a more adaptable fit compared to its predecessor. It also introduces a more responsive FLYTEFOAM cushioning in the midsole, enhancing its performance for a softer landing and more supportive ride.

Older Models

Newer Models

Reviews

Read reviews about the Asics gt-1000 13 from across the internet, including reviews from other runners on Fittir, wear testers from google & youtube, and more.

Reviews on Fittir (-)

...

Wear-tester reviews (9)

3.7/5

Prices

Find the best price for the Asics gt-1000 13 from across the internet with our partnered shoe retailers*.

Only null

We couldn't find any stock with our partners. Try searching google instead.

*When you click through to the retailer, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Its a great way to support us and keep this site free.

Similar Shoes

Most similar

Cheaper

More cushioned

Lighter

More responsive

Softer Cushion

Same brand

Different brand

Less cushioned

More expensive

New

Find out if the Asics gt-1000 13 is right for you.

Get a personalised running shoe recommendation based on your preferences and needs (free).

Get a recommendation

Asics gt-1000 13

Asics gt-1000 13

Surface

Cushioning

Category

Breathability

Weight

Heel-to-Toe Drop

Support

Width options

Grip

Suitability

Based on your running style and needs

Want to know if the Asics gt-1000 13 is right for you?

Pros & Cons

Most Mentioned Pros

Most Mentioned Cons

cushion

Pros

Cons

comfort

Pros

Cons

durability

Pros

Cons

performance

Pros

Cons

fit

Pros

Cons

stability

Pros

Cons

grip

Pros

Cons

other

Pros

Cons

Need help picking the right size?

Older Models

Newer Models

...

3.7/5

Similar Shoes

Find out if the Asics gt-1000 13 is right for you.